RESUMO
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many oncology practices began offering virtual visits via video and/or telephone. How such visits are perceived by Black patients, who have historically faced access barriers and poorer cancer outcomes, is not known. We elicited Black patients' perceptions of and experiences with oncology virtual visits. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews with Black adults receiving oncology care for head and neck cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma between 6/1/19 - 3/20/21 from two US-based academic health systems. The interview guide elicited virtual visit perceptions and experiences within predefined themes (e.g., ease of use, usefulness, communication quality, appropriateness). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for a priori themes and new ones identified during data immersion. Two trained research assistants coded transcripts, using Atlas.ti for data management. Forty-nine adults completed an interview between 9/2021 and 2/2022 (n=16 head and neck, n=16 prostate, and n=17 multiple myeloma);mean age 63 years (range: 39-75), 53% male, and 77% ever having a virtual visit. Participants indicated communication with their doctor and privacy was comparable between in-person and virtual visits but expressed feeling less human connectedness during virtual visits. They cited convenience advantages (e.g., being home, flexibility when physicians run late, and reduced travel barriers);however, they also reported preferring in-person visits, due to wanting doctors to conduct physical examinations or needing in-person testing. Participants described wanting a choice regarding visit type and valued it when physicians articulated the option to conduct an in-person visit (i.e., patient-centeredness in scheduling). To overcome technical barriers to virtual visit attendance, patients received assistance from adult children, physicians, and other support. We identified barriers to and facilitators of virtual visit use among Black patients receiving cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Patient Education & Counseling is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
RESUMO
Earlier research has shown the significant role of personality in serving as risk or protective factors in psychological wellbeing. However, it is less clear the extent to which personality plays in coping with the Covid-19 pandemic. The aim of the current study was to examine the role of a personality risk factors such as self-criticism, and personality strengths such as efficacy and intrinsic motivation representing resilience in predicting psychological outcomes in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. As part of a broader longitudinal study, personality measures were assessed at ages 23 and 29, and Covid-19-related outcomes were measured at age 41 on a subsample of 83 Israeli participants, who were approached after the first lockdown that was implemented (April 2020). Findings showed that self-criticism measured at age 23 anticipated greater Covid-19-related distress and lower satisfaction at age 41. Decrease in self-criticism from age 23 to 29, which indicates developmental progress toward maturity, explained lower non-adaptive emotional reactions at age 41- lower distress and lower anxiety. In addition, a higher level of intrinsic motivation at age 29 explained a greater likelihood to expect post pandemic growth. Findings highlight the role of personality in addressing unexpected stressful events such as the current Covid-19 pandemic.